| 000 | 00877cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3716-20 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112169 | ||
| 245 | _aIntents and purposes | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0116) 21 April 2001, 143(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the CA decision in "JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham" where the ruling that gave Graham title to development land was overturned because continuing use of land was not regarded as clear evidence of intention to possess. The decision also confirmed that the law on adverse possession is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aSQUATTERS | ||
| 650 | _aADVERSE POSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aJA PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM | ||
| 650 | _aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aLAND OWNERSHIP | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66805 _d66805 |
||