000			01481cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS63791
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u112191
245			_aPeacock and another v Custins and another
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2000] 13 EG 152-158 (7)
520			_aCA 14 November 2000. Claimants P. owned agricultural land which had the benefit of a right of way over land (yellow) belonging to defendents C. Easement expressed in title deeds as being a right of way 'at all times and at all purposes'. P sold part of a different property without retaining the right of way to part retained (blue) adjoining the red land. Red and blue land were let to a tenant. CC allowed P's claim that they were entitled to access the blue land but made declarations as to the width and location of the right of way. C's appeal contesting that P's use of the yellow land to trespass was allowed in part. Held P was not entitled to use the yellow land for the purposes for cultivation but contractors sale was allowable to establish the width and location of the right of way.
590			_aABS
650			_aPEACOCK V CUSTINS
650			_aRIGHT OF WAY
650			_aEASEMENTS
650			_aADJOINING LAND
650			_aTRESPASS
650			_aCULTIVATION
690			_aBoundary disputes _96221
856			_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/D8C4B3CBA57593448025699300499A0E?OpenDocument
942			_n0
999			_c66817 _d66817