000			01626cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS63850
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u112399
100			_aGroton, J.
245		2	_aA comparison of dispute review boards and adjudication
260			_c2001
490			_aInternational Construction Law Review _v18(2) April 2001, 275-291(17)
520			_aCompares the development and characteristics of the United States' Dispute Review Board System (DRBS) with the English adjudication process. Dispute Review Boards have proved remarkably successful, although a few of the non-binding decisions issued have been taken to a binding dispute resolution process, and are growing in popularity. Considers the objectives of dispute resolution systems and precursors to DBRS and adjudication and includes and analysis of the difference between the two systems. Concludes that the results of DBRS is generally more satisfactory to the parties involved than those of adjudication but acknowledges that this may reflect that fact that it is voluntarily entered into.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARD SYSTEM
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION BOARDS
650			_aDRBS
650			_aUNITED STATES
690			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
700			_aRubin, R.
700			_aQuintas, B.
942			_n0
999			_c66896 _d66896