| 000 | 01089cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63935 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112633 | ||
| 100 | _aAkenhead, R | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA question of judgment | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8182) 27 April 2001, 54(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case of "Bedfordshire CC v Fitzpatrick", which began as a straightfoward construction dispute with each party claiming the other had repudiated a term maintenance contract. The situation escalated when the council, against whom the judgment went, accused Fitzpatrick of obtaining the contract by unlawful means and applied to set aside the judgment on these terms. This application was dismissed. Concludes that attempts to set aside a judgment are difficult to secure, particularly if one alleges fraud. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBEDFORDSHIRE CC V FITZPATRICK CONTRACTORS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aFRAUD | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aCOLLUSION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67044 _d67044 |
||