| 000 | 01214cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63976 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112636 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe weakest link | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8183) 4 May 2001, 58-59(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case of "Austen Hall Building Ltd v Buckland Securities", in which Buckland challenged the adjudicator's decision claiming the basic principles of adjudication as set out in the Construction Act 1996 are incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. The judge found that adjudication has no connection with the Human Rights Act, because article 6 of the convention only applies to legal proceedings in tribunals, and adjudicators make decisions rather than enforceable judgments. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aAUSTIN HALL BUILDING LTD V BUCKLAND SECURITIES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67045 _d67045 |
||