| 000 | 01319cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64033 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112697 | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe Knightsbridge shroud | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0019) 12 May 2001, 137(1) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the issue of shroud advertisements that can cover whole sides of buildings, and are considered eyesores by some. Considers the outcome in "Kensington and Chelsea Royal London BC v Harvey Nichols & Co Ltd and another", which involved the attempts of a planning authority to have a shroud advertisement removed. Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s187B gives the courts power to grant injunctions for both actual and apprehended breaches of planning control. Reveals that case law indicates courts are prepared to help planning authorities obtain injunctions under s178B. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S178(B) | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS) REGULATIONS 1992 | ||
| 650 | _aKENSINGTON AND CHELSEA LBC V HARVEY NICHOLS AND CO LTD AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aRUNNYMEDE BC V HARWOOD | ||
| 650 | _aADVERTISEMENTS | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 700 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67089 _d67089 |
||