| 000 | 01091cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63941 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112804 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G | ||
| 245 | _aJudgment of limitation and exclusion clauses | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v408(6326) 10 May 2001, 73(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the intepretation of exclusion and limitation clauses as explored in the case, "BHP Petroleum v British Steel". British Steel was allowed to rely upon a rectification clause to exclude liability for defects in pipeline it supplied, because the wording in the clause relating to time limits was clear and unambigious. The case highlights that clearly drafted exclusion clauses will completely exclude certain types of liability. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS LIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aEXCLUSION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aBHP PETROLEUM V BRITISH STEEL | ||
| 650 | _aRECTIFICATION | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67154 _d67154 |
||