| 000 | 01512cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63949 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112855 | ||
| 100 | _aElliott, T | ||
| 245 | _aJudges beware | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8185) 18 May 2001, 58-59(2) |
||
| 520 | _aQuestions the use of case management as demonstrated in "The Royal Brompton Hospital National Service Trust v Hammond and Others" (2001), where the judge's decision to strike out claims, made in accordance with the Woolf reforms, was overruled by the CA. The judge doubted the substance of some of Brompton's allegations and using the powers of the Civil Procedure Rules struck most of the claims out. However, the CA claimed that the balance of probabilities test adopted by the judge was not sufficient proof to strike out claims, and decided that the issues should be determined at a full trial. Copy of judgement available on http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/D61D800F52CC36BD80256A3300340860?OpenDocument | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aWOOLF REFORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCASE MANAGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST V HAMMOND AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aSTRIKING OUT | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-LAW | ||
| 856 | _uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/D61D800F52CC36BD80256A3300340860?OpenDocument | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67177 _d67177 |
||