| 000 | 01209cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64007 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112915 | ||
| 100 | _aHancock, C | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA question over pay as you go | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0117) 28 April 2001, 216-217(2) |
||
| 520 | _aRecent case law illustrates how landlords and tenants must give considerable thought to dilapidation claims at the termination of a lease. Discusses the cases of "Craven (Building) Ltd v SoS Health" and "Firle Investments Ltd v Datapoint International Ltd" which raise the following key points: diminution in value is linked to the real market for the premises; a landlord's intentions at the termination of the lease must be determined; the needs of a hypothetical buyer and transaction have to be considered. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDIMINUTION IN VALUE | ||
| 650 |
_aDilapidations _96235 |
||
| 650 | _aDISREPAIR | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aCRAVEN (BUILDERS) LTD V SOS HEALTH | ||
| 650 | _aFIRLE INVESTMENTS LTD V DATAPOINT INTERNATIONAL LTD | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67215 _d67215 |
||