000 01360cam a2200241 4500
001 ABS64032
008 000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u112920
100 _aBennett, S
245 4 _aThe copyright catch
260 _c2001
490 _aHouseBuilder
_vMay 2001, 24(1)
520 _aConsiders how issues of copyright are often neglected by planners, and highlights that the original author of an architectural drawing will always own the copyright if there is no agreement to the contrary. Discusses the case of "Cala Homes (South) Limited v Alfred McAlpine Homes East Limited" where the developer wanted to use architectural drawings created by joint authorship for another development. Also examines the case of "Blair v Osborne and Tomkins" which considers the rights of a third party to use drawings to further develop a site. Concludes that to avoid confusion, a standard form agreement which clearly state who owns copyright in drawings or designs is advisable.
590 _aABS
650 _aCOPYRIGHT
650 _aARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
650 _aBUILDING DESIGNS
650 _aPLANNING PERMISSION
650 _aCALA HOMES (SOUTH) LTD V ALFRED MCALPINE HOMES EAST LTD
650 _aBLAIR V OSBORNE AND TOMKINS
690 _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942 _n0
999 _c67218
_d67218