| 000 | 01217cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63944 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112921 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G | ||
| 245 | _aInvestigates how a compromise agreement can be legal and binding | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v408(6324) 25 April 2001, 29(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIllustrates through "Joseph Finney Plc v Gordon Vickers and Gary Vickers t/a The Mill Hotel" how a compromise agreement can be binding and a promise not to adjudicate is a promise of value. The case arose from confusion over particular amendments to the JCT 1980 standard form, and concerned a compromise agreement between the parties to avoid adjudication. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aJOSEPH FINNEY PLC V GORDON VICKERS AND GARY VICKS T/A THE MILL HOTEL | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPROMISE AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aJCT STANDARD FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT (1980 EDITION) | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CONTRACTS-JCT CONTRACTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67219 _d67219 |
||