| 000 | 01859cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X112939 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u112939 | ||
| 245 | _aNorris and Norris v Birmingham City Council | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v41(4) [2001] RVR 89-91(3) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 23 February 2000. CA 13 November 1997. The appellants (N) were owners of a property, occupied by tenants, and appealed against a decision of Birmingham valuation tribunal that a dwelling occupied by two persons under licence agreements was a house in multiple occasion and fell within the Council Tax (Liability for Owners) Regulations 1992 Class C (b) (i). N contended that at all times the occupants of their property had been tenants or there from a right granted by tenant W not N, and thus were not there by virtue of a licence to occupy within the meaning of Class C (b) (ii). N also contended that the tenants were joint tenants of the whole property and were liable to pay as such. The tribunal found that Class C (b) (i) was not met as the tenants were not prevented from occupying any part of the dwelling and there was no evidence of exclusivity. The tribunal also found that Class C (b) (ii) must apply as the tenancy agreement is also a licence to occupy. Appeal dismissed. It was found that the tribunal were right to conclude that the occupants of the dwelling were there according to a licence to occupy and the occupants were not liable to pay rent or a licence fee in respect of the dwelling as a whole. | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNCIL TAX | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION | ||
| 650 | _aNORRIS AND NORRIS V BIRMINGHAM CC | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNCIL TAX (LIABILITY OF OWNERS) REGULATIONS 1992 | ||
| 650 | _aLICENCE AGREEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67229 _d67229 |
||