| 000 | 00983cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3723-28 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113103 | ||
| 245 | _aProfessional and ordinary negligence | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v409(6331) 13 June 2001, 26(1) |
||
| 520 | _aStudies the decision in "JD Williams & Co v Michael Hyde and Associates", CA 6 July 2000 and the issue of the tests to be applied to establish professional negligence. The implication is that negligence may readily be found, even in circumstances where a substantial body of opinion within the profession might support the course of action taken. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aJD WILLIAMS & CO V MICHAEL HYDE AND ASSOCIATES | ||
| 650 | _aBOLAM V FRIERN HOSPITAL | ||
| 650 | _aBOLAM PRINCIPLE | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67333 _d67333 |
||