000			01200cam a2200217 4500
001			X113120
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113120
100			_aMiers, M.
245			_aMaff's mission: a purge too far?
260			_c2001
490			_aCountry Life _v195(22) 31 May 2001, 112-113(2)
520			_aExpresses concern that MAFF's programme of sterilisation of buildings on farms affected by foot and mouth is putting important examples of vernacular architecture at risk. Decontamination techniques recommended in MAFF guidance, including pressure hosing and the burning of timber in poor condition, could leave irreplaceable farm buildings weakened or beyond repair. Questions MAFF's ability to provide a co-ordinated strategy to prevent unnecessary damage, with the fate of many structures dependent on the differing interpretations of the guidelines by field officers.
650			_aAGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS
650			_aDECONTAMINATION
650			_aFARM BUILDINGS
650			_aFOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE
650			_aVERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND REFURBISHMENT-BUILDING CONSERVATION
942			_n0
999			_c67343 _d67343