000			01491cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS64177
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113155
100			_aEdwards, M.
245			_aDescriptive practices
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0122) 2 June 2001, 150(1)
520			_aDiscusses the ruling in "R v Thanet DC ex p Tapp" that under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s192 limitations cannot be imposed on the grant of a certificate of lawfulness of proposed use or development (LDC). In such cases the local authority may only grant the certificate or refuse the application completely. Local authorities do have the power to modify or rewrite the description of the existing use or development on applications under s191 but is still unable to express conditions on the grant of the certificate. This means that, in certain circumstances, either form of LDC is more useful and more valuable that express planning permission.
590			_aABS
650			_aCERTIFICATES OF LAWFULNESS OF EXISTING USE OR DEVELOPMENT
650			_aCERTIFICATES OF LAWFULNESS OF PROPOSED USE OR DEVELOPMENT
650			_aLIMITATIONS
650			_aMATERIAL CHANGE OF USE
650			_aR V THANET DC EX P TAPP
650			_aRESTRICTIONS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S191
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S192
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700			_aMartin, J.
942			_n0
999			_c67378 _d67378