000			01949cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS64137
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113244
100			_aTweeddale, A.
245			_aChallenging juridiction in adjudication proceedings
260			_c2001
490			_aConstruction Law Journal _v17(1) 2001, 3-13(11)
520			_aExamines the grounds on which a party may challenge the jurisdiction of an adjudicator: where there is no dispute; where more than one dispute has be referred to adjudication; where the dispute does not arise under the contract; and where the earlier decision of another adjudicator is revisited. Also considers the possibility of challenging a decision on the basis of a breach of natural justice or the impecuniosity of the successful party. Warns that getting an adjudicator's decision overturned is a difficult process as the courts are frequently reluctant to do so despite the fact that, as adjudication often produces rough justice, the number of applications made is likely to increase. References and case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aMACOB CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD
650			_aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
650			_aSHERWOOD AND CASSON LTD V MACKENZIE ENGINEERING LTD
650			_aFASTRACK CONTRACTORS V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION
650			_aSOS FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS V PERCY THOMAS PARTNERSHIP
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c67448 _d67448