| 000 | 01343cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X113276 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113276 | ||
| 100 | _aHoare, D. | ||
| 245 | _aBills of quantities versus activity schedules for civil engineering projects | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Construction Procurement _v7(1) 2001, 11-26(16) |
||
| 520 | _aCompares three payment mechanisms for priced contracts, bills of quantities method related bills of quantities and activity schedules, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of each. Finds that experience to date suggests that for civil engineering works activity schedules are most appropriate but that for minor civil engineering works where there is only a risk of a small change in quantities and for building work where only minor changes are likely to take place bills of quantities are preferable. | ||
| 650 | _aACTIVITY SCHEDULES | ||
| 650 | _aBILLS OF QUANTITIES | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aENGINEERING CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aNEC | ||
| 650 | _aNEW ENGINEERING CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aPAYMENT SYSTEMS | ||
| 690 |
_aQuantity surveying _96263 |
||
| 700 | _aBroome, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67477 _d67477 |
||