000			01446cam a2200217 4500
001			WB3725-28
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113334
245			_aOption: construction of agreement
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 25 EG 156 (CS) (23/06/01)
520			_a"Smith and others v Royce Properties Ltd", CA 14 June 2001. Claimant trustees sold land within the green belt subject to a repurchasing option agreement which required planning permission to be granted within 20 years from the 1977 conveyance. The trustees retained ownership of an area of the land, which the council were subsequently willing to remove from the green belt providing certain requirements were met. The trustees were granted planning permission for a scheme and sought to exercise the option agreement. A dispute ensued over what land was covered by the option. The judge disagreed with the trustees definition of the option land and held that the option was not triggered by permission. The trustees appealed. "Held", appeal allowed. It was found that the planning permission granted was enough to allow the trustees to exercise their option.
590			_aWB
650			_aLand use _96251
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aOPTION AGREEMENTS
650			_aGREEN BELT LAND
650			_aSMITH V ROYCE PROPERTIES LTD
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c67515 _d67515