000			01170cam a2200241 4500
001			X113359
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113359
100			_aHelps, D.
245			_aIt's all in the timing
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding _v266(8190) 22 June 2001, 51(1)
520			_aDiscusses the definition of concurrent delays given by the courts in "Henry Boot Construction (UK) v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester)" and "Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v FA Hammond and others" arguing that it was not clear in the latter ruling whether only delays that occur at exactly the same time are concurrent, what happens when two critical delays overlap but do not meet this definition, and how the court would distinguish between critical and a non-critical delay.
650			_aCONCURRENT DELAYS
650			_aCRITICAL DELAYS
650			_aDELAYS
650			_aEXTENSIONS OF TIME
650			_aHENRY BOOT CONSTRUCTION (UK) V MALMAISON HOTEL (MANCHESTER)
650			_aNON-CRITICAL DELAYS
650			_aROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST V HAMMOND AND OTHERS
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c67534 _d67534