000			01485cam a2200301 4500
001			X113361
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113361
100			_aWillbourne, C.
245			_aHow will White v White affect Inheritance Act 1975 cases?
260			_c2001
490			_aNew Law Journal _v151(6989) 22 June 2001, 922-926
520			_aLooks at the implications of "White v White" in cases where the deceased fails to leave reasonable financial provision for his or her spouse, preferring instead to benefit others. Concludes that the judgement that there should no longer be discrimination between the money earner and the child carer or homemaker and the replacement of 'reasonable requirements' in favour of equality means that the potential claim of the survivor is much larger than before.Copy of House of Lords Judgement available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001026/white-1.htm
650			_aCOWAN V COWAN
650			_aDEPENDANTS
650			_aINHERITANCE
650			_aINHERITANCE (PROVISION FOR FAMILY AND DEPENDANTS) ACT 1975
650			_aINHERITANCE LAW
650			_aPERSONAL CHATTELS
650			_aSPOUSES
650			_aSTATUTORY LEGACIES
650			_aWHITE V WHITE
690			_aLAW
700			_aCrawley, G.
700			_aPennington, W.
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001026/white-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c67536 _d67536