| 000 | 01377cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64152 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113377 | ||
| 100 | _aHursthouse, T | ||
| 245 | _aTicking away | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8190) 22 June 2001, 39-41(3) |
||
| 520 | _aHousing Associations (HAs) have three years to demonstrate Egan compliance or risk losing government funding for social housing schemes. Discusses the problems HAs and Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) face in proving compliance which include the bureaucratic Housing Corporation compliance scheme, housing contractors' lack of motivation with Egan, having to formalise procedures such as contractor agreements that work better on an ad hoc basis, and potentially higher costs. Concludes that whilst the Housing Corporation does not agree with all these complaints, it has admitted to cost concerns and suggested that a short-cut approach to full Egan compliance may be a better option. Lists the nine ways HAs can demonstrate Egan compliance. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSOCIAL HOUSING | ||
| 650 | _aEGAN REFORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aEGAN REFORMS | ||
| 650 | _aREGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ASSOCIATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING CORPORATION | ||
| 690 |
_aAffordable housing _96215 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67544 _d67544 |
||