000			01635cam a2200265 4500
001			X113381
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113381
100			_aWarnock, D.
245			_aZero in on adjudication
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0125) 23 June 2001, 152(1)
520			_aOutlines the debate surrounding the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on adjudication contrasting the ruling in "Austin Hall Building Ltd v Buckland Securities Ltd" with extra-judicial comment made by Judge Thornton and noting that conflicting views may lead to inconsistency in the courts' approach. Observes that challenges to an adjudicators award are unlikely to succeed except on the grounds of jurisdiction and natural justice, and that under the Human Rights Act 1996 s6 adjudicators are not public authorities. Case law.
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aNATURAL JUSTICE
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6
650			_aAUSTIN HALL BUILDING LTD V BUCKLAND SECURITIES LTD
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
700			_aMendelblat, M.
942			_n0
999			_c67548 _d67548