| 000 | 01677cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64142 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113456 | ||
| 245 | _aDiscain Project Services Ltd v Opecprime Developments Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[2001] CILL 1739-1741(3) |
||
| 520 | _aTCC 11 April 2001. An application for summary judgment was refused on the grounds that to enforce the adjudicator's decision as, whilst it was accepted that was no actual bias on the his part, the adjudicator had failed to control the conduct of the proceedings as to prevent him being improperly approached by one of the parties and that this constituted a substantial breach of the rules of natural justice. Copy of judgement available on http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/EF755F9F752FDE1F80256A34005BC423?OpenDocument | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aBIAS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMUNICATION | ||
| 650 | _aDISCAIN PROJECT SERVICES LTD V OPECPRIME DEVELOPMENT LTD | ||
| 650 | _aIMPARTIALITY | ||
| 650 | _aNATURAL JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aTELEPHONES | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 856 | _uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/EF755F9F752FDE1F80256A34005BC423?OpenDocument | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67594 _d67594 |
||