| 000 | 01249cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3727-22 | ||
| 008 | 010711n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113601 | ||
| 245 | _aRent review clauses | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0127) 7 July 2001, 130(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the issue of whether time is of the essence in respect of various provisions within a rent review clause. In the 1977 landmark ruling - "United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley BC" , HL decided that, normally, time is not of the essence. Discusses two recent cases - "McDonald's Property Co Ltd v HSBC Bank" and "Cheapside Land Development Co v Messels Service Co" - which challenged aspects of the "United Scientific" ruling. Concludes that the existence of a detailed timetable is not sufficient to render time of the essence. The 1977 HL ruling must still be regarded as authoritative. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC | ||
| 650 | _aMCDONALD'S PROPERTY CO LTD V HSBC BANK | ||
| 650 | _aCHEAPSIDE LAND DEVELOPMENT CO V MESSELS SERVICE CO | ||
| 650 | _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67687 _d67687 |
||