| 000 | 01316cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64170 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113619 | ||
| 245 | _aBankway Properties Ltd v Penfold-Dunsford and another | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 26 EG 164-173(10) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 April 2001. In February 1994 the defendant tenants (P) were granted an assured tenancy as expressed in written agreement, which contained clause 8(b)(iii) stating rent to be £25,000 from February 1996. When P fell into arrears, the claimant landlord (B) issued proceedings for possession, which was granted. P appealed claiming clause 8(b)(iii) was not a valid provision to increase the rent, but was incorporated to enable the B to gain possession under the Housing Act 1988. "Held": The appeal was allowed on the grounds that the review clause was an unlawful contracting out of the Act and therefore had to be ignored. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aBANKWAY PROPERTIES LTD V DUNSFORD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aBANKWAY PROPERTIES LTD V PENFOLD-DUNSFORD | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTING OUT | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67700 _d67700 |
||