000			00947cam a2200193 4500
001			WB3729-18
008			010726n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113782
245			_aLandlord and Tenant
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 29 EG 121 (CS)
520			_a"Barclays Bank plc v Bee and another" CA 10 July 2001. Two S2 notices were accidentally saved simultaneoulsy by landlord (X) the first stating that an application for a new tenancy would not be opposed whilst the second opposed the application and was deemed to be invalid for failing to state the reason. A third notice opposing the application was issued. CA upheld the HC's decision that X was entitled to rely on the third notice. Tenant's Y appeal was dismissed.
590			_aWB
650			_aNEW LEASE
650			_aBARCLAYS BANK PLC V BEE
650			_aTENANCY AGREEMENT
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c67788 _d67788