000			01573cam a2200241 4500
001			WB3729-19
008			010726n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113790
245			_aLeasehold Valuation Tribunal
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 29 EG 122 (CS)
520			_a"Daejan Properties Ltd v London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal" CA 12 July. Tenant (B) was paying service charges for a flat in London. B applied to the LVT under S19(2A) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Issue of whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to determine whether service charges had already been paid by B. Landlord (D) submitted that there were reasons for tribunal's powers being limited. LVT ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear applications in relation to service charges that had been paid. The HC dismissed D's appeal that the LVT did not have jurisdiction to consider service charges which had been paid. The CA overturned the HC's decision allowing D's appeal. Full copy of judgement available on http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/0F587CAFA3EE0EE180256A8B0036A64E?OpenDocument
590			_aWB
650			_aR V LONDON LVT EX P DAEJAN PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S19 (2A)
650			_aRESTITUTION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/0F587CAFA3EE0EE180256A8B0036A64E?OpenDocument
942			_n0
999			_c67790 _d67790