| 000 | 00877cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3729-17 | ||
| 008 | 010726n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113808 | ||
| 245 | _aHave your cake and eat it | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0129) 21 July 2001, 118(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the recent CA decision in "Sun Life Assurance plc v Racal Tracs Ltd" where the decision not to award a tenant compensation under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s26 was overturned. Key concept is that a tenant's intention is not a relevant factor when considering the validity of section 26 request for a new tenancy. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S26 | ||
| 650 | _aSECTION 26 NOTICE | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE RENEWAL | ||
| 650 | _aSUN LIFE ASSURANCE PLC V RACAL TRACS LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67799 _d67799 |
||