000			01600cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64211
008			010726n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113815
100			_aBrewer, G.
245			_aGeoff Brewer examines whether witholding notices are necessary in payment disputes
260			_c2001
490			_aContract Journal _v409(6335) 11 July 2001, 22(1)
520			_aDiscusses the Construction Act 1996 s110(2) which involves the requirements for payment notices. Argues that the Technology and Construction Court has not provided clear guidance on the operation of these provisions but that a recent case "SL Timber Systems v Carillion Construction" (2001) does offer definite guidance at last. SL Timber argued that Carillion had failed to give payment or witholding notices and therefore payment should be made without further enquiry. The outcome of the case however,illustrates that the absence of a Section 110(2) payment notice does not prevent the paying party from arguing that the money claimed is not due under the contractual terms.
590			_aABS
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S110(2)
650			_aSL TIMBER SYSTEMS LTD V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD
650			_aPAYMENT NOTICES
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aDISPUTES
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aPAYMENTS
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
999			_c67806 _d67806