| 000 | 01615cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64255 | ||
| 008 | 010730n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113842 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G. | ||
| 245 | _aGeoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting examines an adjudicator's judgement of his own jurisdiction | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v409(6334) 4 July 2001, 21(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the case of "Nordot Engineering Services Ltd v Siemans plc" (2001) which serves as a reminder to parties undertaking adjudication to choose their words carefully in their dealings with the adjudicator. The dispute arose over the payment for various items of plant and equipment supplied by Nordot. The central issue was whether parties can give an ajudicator the power to deal with a dispute as to his own jurisdiction. The outcome being that if parties agree the adjudicator's power can be extended to include his own jurisdiction. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aPLANT AND MACHINERY | ||
| 650 | _aNORDOT ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD V SIEMANS PLC | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PART 24 | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67823 _d67823 |
||