000			01654cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64288
008			010802n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113919
245			_aPhyllis Trading Ltd v 86 Lordship Road Ltd
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2001] 28 EG 147-151(5)
520			_aCA 19 February 2001. X, the appellantnominee purchaser was appointed by tenants in connection of their rights of collective enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform and Urban Development Act 1993, in respect of leasehold premises at 86 Lordship Road, Stoke Newington, London N6. The respondent landlord appealed to the LT againts the LVT's determination of the amount payable of £3,3000. By a letter dated 6 October 1999, a 'Calderbank' offer was made by X in the amount of £4,000. The LTaccepted P's submissions that there were still outstanding issues for dispute regarding costs to P's 'calderbank' offer, as the offer was too uncertain to be accepted and awarded costs to the landlord. X appealed, "Held", the appeal was allowed on the basis that the LT was wrong to dismiss a reasonable offer by a purchaser on the grounds that it did not contain provisions regarding costs in the even of a settlement.
590			_aABS
650			_aCALDERBANK OFFERS
650			_aCOSTS
650			_aCOLLECTIVE ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aPHYLLIS TRADING LTD V 86 LORDSHIP ROAD LTD
650			_aPURCHASE PRICE
650			_aPREMIUM
650			_aFREEHOLD
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c67882 _d67882