| 000 | 01249cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64257 | ||
| 008 | 010803n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113935 | ||
| 100 | 1 | _aCheffings, N. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aStand up and be counted |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0127) 7 July 2001, 126-127(2) |
|
| 520 | _aArgues that arbitrators are not as effective as they could be, as they lack the confidence to use the authority invested in them by the Arbitration Act 1996 s1. The aim of the article is to give arbitrators the confidence to exercise the power conferred on them by the Act. Outlines the arbitrator's remit and points out that as long as an arbitrator complies with the Act, it is very difficult for the parties to challenge the award. Finally the article reiterates that the Act gives arbitrators all the protection needed to act without delay and unnecessary expense. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S33 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S68 | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATORS | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aKing, V. | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67889 _d67889 |
||