000			01396cam a2200301 4500
001			ABS64258
008			010806n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113966
100			_aCohen, R.
245		3	_aAn alternative resolution
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0128) 14 July 2001, 136-137(2)
520			_aConsiders whether the adjudication process could provide a quicker, cheaper and more effective process than when landlords and tenants pursue a service charge dispute through the courts. Looks at the case of "Fluor Daniel Properties Ltd v Shortlands Investments Ltd" (2001) which illustrates the problems that are encountered in resolving service charge disputes in commercial premises via the courts. Lists the various matters which would need to be included in a model adjudication agreement.
590			_aABS
650			_aCOSTS
650			_aMODEL ADJUDICATION PROCEDURE
650			_aMODEL AGREEMENTS
650			_aSERVICE CHARGE DISPUTES
650			_aDELAY
650			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
650			_aLANDLORDS
650			_aTENANTS
650			_aFLUOR DANIEL PROPERTIES LTD V SHORTLANDS INVESTMENTS LTD
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
700			_aWalton, M.
942			_n0
999			_c67917 _d67917