| 000 | 01311cam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64300 | ||
| 008 | 010806n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113973 | ||
| 100 | _aWinter, J. | ||
| 245 | _aDon't leave it to a judge to define your responsibility | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6726) 26 July 2001, 25(1) |
||
| 520 | _aWith reference to case law explains how project managers must define as clearly as possible, in their terms of engagement, precisely what their obligations to their clients are. Discusses cases "Pride Valley Foods v Hall & Partners"; "Pozzolanic Lytag v Bryan Hobson Associates"(1999); "Chesham Properties Ltd v Bucknall Austin Project Management Services Ltd"(1996) and "Copthorne Hotel (Newcastle) v Arup Associates"(1999). | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTERMS OF ENGAGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aOBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPROJECT MANAGERS | ||
| 650 | _aCLIENTS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITIES | ||
| 650 | _aPRIDE VALLEY FOODS V HALL & PARTNERS | ||
| 650 | _aPOZZOLANIC LYTAG LTD V BRYAN HOBSON ASSOCIATES | ||
| 650 | _aCHESHAM PROPERTIES LTD V BUCKNALL AUSTIN PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOPTHORNE HOTEL (NEWCASTLE) LTD V ARUP ASSOCIATES | ||
| 690 |
_aProject management _96261 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67924 _d67924 |
||