| 000 | 01190cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64260 | ||
| 008 | 010806n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u113974 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aNothing by halves | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8193) 13 July 2001, 51(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the case of "Farebrother Building Services Ltd v Frogmore Investments Ltd" to see what happens if an adjudicator makes a mistake and does not take into account part of the defence, whether the decision can be overturned. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aFAREBROTHER BUILDING SERVICES LTD V FROGMORE INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aTECSA ADJUDICATION RULES | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aTECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION SOLICITORS ASSOCIATION | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c67925 _d67925 |
||