000			01231cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS64291
008			010807n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u113984
245			_aCircuit Systems Ltd and W J Basten v Zuke-Reduc (UK) Ltd
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v6 [2001] 253-266(14)
520			_aCA 21 March 2001. Basten (B) sought leave to appeal against a ruling in favour of the defendant (Z) who had applied under CPR 3.4(2)(b) to strike out a re-amended statement of claim. B also sought an extension of time to appeal. "Held": The applications were dismissed on the grounds that extending the time to appeal would serve no useful purpose; that the CA only had the power to interfere where the judge was clearly wrong in his approach or conclusions; and that the judge had exercised his discretion correctly in considering the overriding objectives of CPR and the history of the case.
590			_aABS
650			_aCIRCUIT SYSTEMS LTD AND BASTEN V ZUKEN-REDAC (UK) LTD
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES PART 3.4(2)(C)
650			_aDISCRETION
650			_aFAILURE TO COMPLY
650			_aSTRIKE OUT
690			_aLAW
942			_n0
999			_c67933 _d67933