000			00879cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3731-36
008			010809n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114044
245			_aNothing but the truth
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0131) 4 August 2001, 99(1)
520			_aConsiders the decision in "Banks v Cox" which highlights the distinction between caveat emptor and misrepresentation. The defendants were found guilty of fraud because they did not respond honestly to a conveyancing enquiry regarding the financial viability of their business.
590			_aWB
650			_aCAVEAT EMPTOR
650			_aBANKS V COX
650			_aMISREPRESENTATION
650			_aFRAUD
650			_aCONVEYANCING
650			_aFINANCIAL VIABILITY
650			_aNURSING HOMES
650			_aMATERIAL CHANGE
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c67977 _d67977