| 000 | 01181cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3731-34 | ||
| 008 | 010816n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114173 | ||
| 245 | _aLandlord and tenant: rent review | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 32 EG 89 (CS) (11/8/01) |
||
| 520 | _a"Starmark Enterprises Ltd v CPL Distribution Ltd" CA 31 July 2001. Appellant (C) and respondent (S) were landlord and tenant. C served a notice for a rent increase, and S failed to serve a counternotice within specified time limit. C claimed a rent review clause bound S to pay the increase. High Court ruled in favour of S. C appealed. Appeal allowed on grounds that decision in "Henry Smiths Charity Trustees v AWADA" was more applicable than "Mecca Leisure v Renown Investments (Holdings) Ltd". | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSTARMARK ENTERPRISES V CPL DISTRIBUTION | ||
| 650 | _aMECCA LEISURE LTD V RENOWN INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aHENRY SMITHS CHARITY TRUSTEES V AWADA | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68021 _d68021 |
||