| 000 | 01316cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64365 | ||
| 008 | 010816n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114177 | ||
| 100 | _aRoss, J | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe fundamental importance of expert evidence | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v151(6992) 13 July 2001, 1055(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the case of "Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust & others v Troup Bywaters and Anders (a firm)" [2001] All ER (D) 341 (May) and the issues raised by this case over the value of expert evidence in professional negligence cases. Article warns that expert evidence can fall apart when tested at trial and that expert evidence needs to address all relevant issues, not just the personal view of the expert. In this particular case, the expert witness had concentrated on his own opinion and not allowed for any difference of view by a reasonably competent services engineer over the issue. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aCROSS EXAMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aHAMMERSMITH HOSPITALS NHS TRUST V TROUP BYWATERS AND ANDERS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68025 _d68025 |
||