| 000 | 01319cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64443 | ||
| 008 | 010820n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114200 | ||
| 245 | _aUSSR Club Ltd and the Putney Club v Thorneley (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v[2001] RA 144-165(11) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 26 April 2001. Examined the issue of the proper method to be used when valuing the two appeal properties where neither were let, in order to estimate their annual value in accordance with rating hypothesis. The USSR Club Ltd had been assessed at £19,500 and The Putney Club at £38,500. The ratepayers wanted the valuation based on club turnover taken from audited accounts while the VO considered the use of rental evidence of comparable club premises in south London. It was held that the assessment for the USSR Club Ltd should be confirmed and the assessment of the Putney Club to be reduced. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aUSSR CLUB LTD AND THE PUTNEY CLUB V THORNELEY (VO) | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aMEMBERS' CLUBS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aEVIDENCE OF VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARABLES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aANNUAL VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aTURNOVER | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68033 _d68033 |
||