| 000 | 01587cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64321 | ||
| 008 | 010828n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114334 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe implications of condition precedent non-compliance | |
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v410(6341) 22 August 2001, 24(1) |
||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v418(6429) 4 June 2003, 21(1) |
||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6823) 3 July 2003, 24(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the case "City Inn Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd" and the issue raised over whether a requirement for notices stated to be 'condition precedent' to a contractor's entitlement may be construed as a penalty and unenforceable. The clause was designed to ensure the employer would be informed if and when the contractor thought that the issue of an architect's instruction would cause delay. The implication in this case shows that a clause requiring notification and particulars of the effects of instructions as a condition precedent to an entitlement for extension of time will generally not be construed as a penalty. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCONDITION PRECEDENTS | ||
| 650 | _aNON-COMPLIANCE | ||
| 650 | _aCITY INN LTD V SHEPHERD CONSTRUCTION LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aPENALTIES | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CONTRACTS-JCT CONTRACTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68081 _d68081 |
||