| 000 | 01289cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64353 | ||
| 008 | 010828n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114340 | ||
| 100 | _aParratt, D | ||
| 245 | _aIs construction arbitration failing? | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v17(3) 2001, 209-215(7) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the role arbitration plays in dispute resolution and whether it is failing the construction industry with more cases going to adjudication. Argues that initially arbitration was limited by court procedure but now that certain points of law have been resolved, the arbitrator has greater freedom, constrained only by principles of fairness, impartiality and elimination of unnecessary delay and expense, while aggrieved parties have less recourse to go to the courts should they dispute the adjudicator's findings. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68087 _d68087 |
||