000			01409cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS64412
008			010907n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114481
100			_aElvin, D
245		4	_aThe Alconbury litigation: principle and pragmatism
260			_c2001
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2001] JPL 883-902(11)
520			_aDiscusses the Alconbury cases which raised the issue of whether the processes by which the SoS Environment makes decisions and orders under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the Transport and Works Act, the Highways Act 1980 and the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 are compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 s6(1). It was held that the processes involved in these cases were incompatible but that the SoS Environment had not acted unlawfully under s6(1) because s6(2)(b) applied and the SoS's appeals were allowed. Article shows how the HL decision is consistent with Strasbourg authority.
590			_aABS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS EX P ALCONBURY DEVELOPMENTS
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P HOLDING AND BARNES PLC
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P PREMIER LEISURE
650			_aPLANNING
690			_aLAW-UK
700			_aMaurici, J
942			_n0
999			_c68200 _d68200