000			01484cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS64399
008			010910n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114496
245			_aSun Life Assurance plc v Thales Trac Ltd and another
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 34 EG100-105(5)
520			_aCA 10 May 2001. The tenants (T) held two leases from Sun Life (S). S had informed T that it would resist any renewal of the tenancies on redevelopment grounds and the tenants decided to relocate, purchasing adjoining land to the original site. However, T then served two requests for new tenancies; S first opposed it under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1) then withdrew their opposition. T did not reapply for the tenancies and gave up possession. It was found that T had made false proposals in their section 26 notices ; it was decided that the section 26 notices were not valid and T were not entitled to statutory disturbance payment under s37. T's appeal was allowed as the evidence of a tenant's state of mind was held to be inadmissible and legally irrelevant.
590			_aABS
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650			_aSECTION 26 NOTICES
650			_aSUN LIFE ASSURANCE V THALES TRACS LTD AND ANOTHER
650			_aSUN LIFE ASSURANCE PLC V RACAL TRACS LTD
650			_aSTATUTORY COMPENSATION
650			_aDISTURBANCE COMPENSATION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68212 _d68212