| 000 | 01061cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS64593 | ||
| 008 | 010918n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u114623 | ||
| 100 | _aDeLaney, C. | ||
| 245 | _aEarly notice risk | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v66(36) 7 September 2001, 138(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders CA ruling in "Omar v El-Wakil" highlighting the role of the deposit in land contracts, and the risks of serving 'notices to complete' prematurely. Parties must ensure they are 'ready, able and willing to complete' on the date specified in a notice to complete. Outlines the circumstances in which the court is prepared to exercise its discretion under Law of Property Act 1925 s49(2) and order the return of a purchaser's deposit - even to a defaulting buyer. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aOMAR V EL-WAKIL | ||
| 650 | _aDEPOSITS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO COMPLETE | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICES TO QUIT | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S49(2) | ||
| 650 | _aLAND CONTRACTS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c68287 _d68287 |
||