000			01397cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS64571
008			010918n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114624
245			_aMcDonald's Property Co Ltd v HSBC Bank plc
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 36 EG, 181-186(6)
520			_aChD 25 April 2001. Tenant (A) held a lease from landlord (B) at a rent subject to review, on the condition written notice was given within a specified period. It also provided a timetable for the determination of the rent. Notice triggering the first rent review was given late. A challenged the review contending that time was of the essenceand that, as it had been served late, the notice was not valid. A issued a Pt 8 claim, also contending there were compelling contra-indications. B issued an application to strike out A's claim. "Held": the claim and the appeal were dismissed. B's application was dismissed but A was ordered to pay the costs of the application. Time was not of the essence for the triggering of the rent review.
590			_aABS
650			_aMCDONALD'S PROPERTY CO LTD V HSBC BANK
650			_aCHEAPSIDE LAND DEVELOPMENT CO V MESSELS SERVICE CO
650			_aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
650			_aTRIGGER NOTICE
650			_aRENT REVIEW
650			_aLEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68288 _d68288