000			01070cam a2200217 4500
001			WB3735-16
008			010920n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114658
245			_aRestricted data
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0137) 15 September 2001, 152(1)
520			_aDiscusses the recent CA decision in "Daejan Properties Ltd v London LVT"(WB3729-19). This considered whether the wording of the new s19(2A) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 allows an LVT to consider service charge payments already paid by the tenant or whether jurisdiction is confined to those cases in which the disputed sum remains unpaid. CA differed from the trial judge by deciding the LVT did not have jurisdiction to deal with the case.
590			_aWB
650			_aR V LONDON LVT EX P DAEJAN PROPERTIES LTD
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1996
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S19(2A)
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c68312 _d68312