000			01798cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS64582|?UNAUTHORIZED
008			010921n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114679
100			_aWells, M.
245			_aImmunity challenge
260			_c2001
490			_aProperty Week _v66(37) 14 September 2001, 110-111(2)
520			_aConsiders how much immunity a local authority has from liability for any damage caused by the planning decisions it takes. Confirms that a neighbour who is inconvenienced by a development with planning permission has no redress against a local authority. However, notes that in certain circumstances a planning authority may incur a private law liability for loss caused as a result of a planning decision. A planning authority may also, in some circumstances, place itself under a common law duty of care. Discusses "Kane v New Forest D C", which illustrates that a planning authority can be held liable in negligence in the exercise of its development control powers, if that action results in the creation of a source of danger. Full copy of judgment available at: http://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/DFBF1E5C129FABEC80256A73003D60E6?OpenDocument
590			_aABS
650			_aLOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITIES
650			_aLIABILITY
650			_aPLANNING DECISIONS
650			_aDANGER
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aKANE V NEW FOREST DC
650			_aSLOUGH ESTATES V WELWYN HATFIELD DC
650			_aIMMUNITY
650			_aCASE LAW
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
700			_aHarwood, S.
856			_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/DFBF1E5C129FABEC80256A73003D60E6?OpenDocument
942			_n0
999			_c68328 _d68328