000			01416cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS64573
008			010924n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u114802
100			_aHenderson, A.
245			_aStaying eviction
260			_c2001
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v145(33) 7 September 2001, 792-793(2)
520			_aConsiders the law governing the suspension of the execution of warrants for the possession of residential premises. Discusses two recent decisions by the CA - "Sheffield City Council v Hopkins" and "St Brice v Southwark LBC", which represent a welcome addition to the law, particularly in the light of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Human Rights Act 1998. The tenor of both cases is to encourage flexibility. It appears that once a possession order is ready for enforcement then enforcement can go ahead without a further hearing, and the landlord can make further allegations as to why the tenant should leave the property.
590			_aABS
650			_aWARRANTY FOR POSSESSION
650			_aSUSPENSION
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650			_aSHEFFIELD CC V HOPKINS
650			_aST BRICE AND ANOTHER V SOUTHWARK LBC
650			_aEVICTION
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
700			_aHeppinstall, A.
942			_n0
999			_c68346 _d68346