000			01138cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS54490
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10756
041			_aeng
100			_aHemsley, A.
245			_aPractical problems of CDM
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aBuilding _v261(7927) 9 February 1996, 33(1)
520			_aIllustrates the problems that arise when putting the new CDM regulations into practice, through two case studies. The first considers who might be responsible for late start dates when a health and safety plan is rejected by the client after a letter of intent is already signed. The second shows how the regulations demand better understanding of construction work practices by clients and designers.
650			_aCONSTRUCTION (DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT) REGULATIONS 1994
650			_aCONDAM REGULATIONS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION (DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT) REGULATIONS 1994
650			_aHEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
650			_aLETTERS OF INTENT
650			_aSITE SAFETY
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING STANDARDS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6836 _d6836